Loony End-of-the-Worldists Lose Again

POSTED IN:  ~ Religion ~ Atheism ~ Doomsday    Tweet

End-of-the-Worldists Live to Prophesise Another Day

So ridiculous and pathetic are the end-of-the-world predictors, the only ones deserving any respect at all I reckon are those who actually kill themselves, thereby proving that it was indeed the end of the world for some.

And so yet another Judgement Day has come and gone, and here we all are, surprise surprise, although there are those who are saying that the Rapture did, indeed, kind of, y'know, take place, but that Jesus used his magical Cloak of Invisibility to fool us all, and fools there certainly are.

This first video comes from 'The Thinking Atheist' and has been produced in the gravelly-voiced melodramatic manner so many religious propoganda videos are, which is quite funny.

Most pleasing is that it would suggest that there are grounds for hope that not ALL North Americans are religious nutters... which is a beautiful glimmer of hope from that otherwise worrying continent:

The second is also interesting, although you might want to skip the bit that gets quite technical on tectonics, as it were. On the whole it's thoroughly entertaining and quite funny in places.

I'd actually meant to show you yet another video from the Stephen Colbert report, which I've just discovered and which looks very promising. I'll find it eventually and post it in a later episode. Enjoy!

See you in the gene pool

FrabulousFrog

My Favourite Pat Condell Video

POSTED IN:  ~ Religion ~ Atheism ~ Jehovah's Witnesses    Tweet

Ponderings and Pontifications

It's been a while since my last post, as other things have taken over not really worth going into here. But all this time I've been thinking about how I should develop the Frabulous Frog Freethinker further?

I'm going to take the easy way out here and just post someone else's video. Cop out? Well, yes and no, because I'm thinking that as well as original articles it could be good to let you know what's tickled and stimulated me as I go about my daily life. And Pat Condell's videos always do the trick.

I was thinking about my favourite videos of his when I came to the realisation that... they're all good. In fact, they're all great. So I don't really have a 'favourite' as such, but this one is a goodie, so I'm sharing it here, with thanks to the big man himself (Pat) of course.

And there are so many good people out there producing good God-unfearing stuff that I think it could be a good remit to simply share the best stuff I find, along with my own regular articles on science, weirdness and anything else that tickles my irreverent neurons. Shall we do it like that? OK, let's go.

See you in the gene pool

FrabulousFrog

Book Review: "The Atheist's Bible"

POSTED IN:  ~ Books ~ Religion ~ Atheism ~ Collection    Tweet

Click for more info in the Bookshop

The Atheist's Bible

an illustrious collection of irreverent thoughts

by Joan Konner

Duckworth Overlook 2007

There's something irresistibly enjoyable about a collection of excellent things people have said on a subject close to your heart. Isn't there? This is such a volume and I'm sorely tempted to spend the rest of the review simply quoting quotes from it. What? Oh, all right then, I will.

"Gods are fragile things; they may be killed by a whiff of science or a dose of common sense."
   ~ Chapman Cohen

"Religion is fundamentally opposed to everything I hold in veneration - courage, clear thinking, honesty, fairness, and, above all, love of the truth."

   ~ H.L.Mencken

"Epicurus' old questions are yet unanswered. Is [God] willing to prevent evil, but not able? then he is impotent. Is he able, but not willing? then his is malevolent. Is he both able and willing? whence then is evil?"
   ~ David Hume

Oh, I'm sorry, where was I? Oh yes, the book review. Well, The Atheist's Bible is a parody of the real thing. It's divided into chapters with names, some strangely familiar, like Genesis, The Gospel, Revelations, and some not so: Scientosophy, The Tao of Disbelief and The Brimstone Chronicles.

"There was a time when religion ruled the world. It is
known as the Dark Ages." ~ Ruth Hurmence Green

The second half of the book is in the style of 'Books', as in Book of Knowledge, Book of Inspiration and Book of Laughter, followed by particular writers own book, who had a lot to say about religion over the course of their life: Book of Mark (Twain), Book of Bertrand (Russell), Book of Voltaire and Book of Woody (Allen).

"Creator: a comedian whose audience is afraid to laugh."
   ~ H.L.Mencken

The book itself is a pleasure to hold - it seems to be made to fit into your hand and its cute little hardback cover in a kind of subdued sheen seems to ask to be caressed and held close.

"It's hard to be religious when certain people are never incinerated by bolts of lightning."
   ~ Bill Watterson

There are so many shining gems in here it just makes me want to jump up and down and share them with all the poor lost souls who can never appreciate them.

"If we are going to teach 'creation science'... as an alternative to evolution, then we should also teach the stork theory as an alternative to biological reproduction."

   ~ Judith Hayes

"If triangles made a God, they would give him
three sides." ~ Montesquieu

Every page is full of superb, fantastic, hilarious and tragic observations by clear thinkers from all ages.

"The greatest tragedy in mankind's entire history may be the hijacking of morality by religion."

   ~ Arthur C. Clarke

I'm sooo tempted to start a mailing list to send out a daily 'Freethinking Thought of the Day'. Have I possibly got the time?

"From the point of view of a tapeworm, man was created by God to serve the appetite of the tapeworm."

   ~ Edward Abbey

I think you're getting the idea. If you're the sort of person who likes this sort of book, both it's conception and its subject matter, you'll love it. Simple as that!

"Since it is obviously inconceivable that all religions can be right, the most reasonable conclusion is that they are all wrong."

   ~ Christopher Hitchen

Oh, by the way, just in case you were wondering, even though the book is called a 'bible' I have every reason to believe it was written by the hand and mind of man. Mere, mortal man, although on reading it you may be tempted to differ. Yes, it's that good.

See you in the gene pool

FrabulousFrog

Frabulous Frog Bookshop: 'Open For Business'

POSTED IN:  ~ Books ~ Religion ~ Science    Tweet

Open For Business...

Good news people, and I don't mean that I won't even mention Jehovah's Witnesses once in this post: Ooops! There, done it!

 

No, I'm excited to tell you that I've put quite a few of my absolutely favourite freethinking books into the bookshop, along with quite a few which I'm planning on reading but just haven't done so yet.

 

Now don't get me wrong with this fancy 'Bookshop' idea. I'm not really intending to bug you to buy books through it every two days so that I can get some paltry 50c commission or whatever it is. I've done that in the past, never made any money out of it and to be frank it was a bit of a pain in the neck!

 

So why am I doing it? Simply because it's a really fun way to group all my favourite books on bashing religion, philosophical puzzles, evolution and the whole shebang with their pictures, reviews and everything you'd need in case you ever did want to buy some.

 

I actually do buy quite a few books through Amazon, but I generally go for the second-hand ones, which can often be ridiculously cheap, especially after the paperbacks have been out for a while. I'm waiting for Dawkins' Greatest Show On Earth for a few months, for example, because there will be so many sold I'm sure it'll be in the second hand market for a euro or a quid pretty soon (plus postage).

 

So use the bookshop to get some ideas for some excellent reading fodder on your favourite topics and if you ever did buy them having clicked through from here, well thanks!

 

I've created some sections in the bookshop to reflect the general feel of what I'll be presenting on this blog, as follows:

• Frabulous Favourites
• Religion Laid Bare
• Atheism, Humanism, Etc.
• Popular Science
• Philosophical Fun
• Freethinking Frivolity
• Life, the Universe, and...

In making up these categories I chopped and changed and added and deleted until I got to what you see above. Once again I'll say that this site has no pretentions whatsoever. I'm a nobody in the world of atheism, religion, science and plenty of other realms, many of them ending in 'ism', and many not.

 

But by that very fact, and the awareness of my own mortality (Christ, this got deep bloody quickly, didn't it..?) I know that I have as much right to set up my own little blog blethering on about anything I please, and so can you. Unless of course you live in... but we won't go down that route right now.

 

So here it is, for better or for worse, what will be an ever-growing list of what I consider cool books which I'd love it if you read too and why not leave a comment to say what you think? Cheers, and happy head-filling :-D

See you in the gene pool

FrabulousFrog

Cool Blogs ~ 'Anal Iced Bible'

POSTED IN:  ~ Humour ~ Religion ~ Nutters ~ Blogs ~ Bible    Tweet

In The Beginning...

I really can't tell you how glad I am to not be running a blog where I try to knock down religious nutters' arguments.

For a start, I reckon I'd go nuts myself from frustration, as I see many on some forums and comments threads doing every day. And more importantly, there are just too many others doing it too well already.

Today's featured blog is called Anal Iced Bible, and is both a great laugh and an excellent introduction to the bible, should you want one. And to be honest and fair, I feel a good nontheist should at least have read a bit of what it is that so many people say they take more or less literally as the word of a supernatural power that created everthing.

You know what? There's a hell of a lot of Christian-types who (whisper this) haven't actually read the stupid book! Yes! It's true! Just ask a few. I'll bet you anything, whatever they may say, that you will get signs that this is true, if they don't admit it outright.

It's not surprising really. It's quite difficult to read, pretty disjointed, totally illogical of course, and Harry Potter and the Lord of the Rings and Winnie the Pooh and Alice are, quite frankly, much better reads.

However, they say it's the book ghost-written by the creator of all things and who are we to argue?

Well, today's blog pick does, actually, argue. He or she (or it) does it in a funny way, and you can just about read the entire bible with them (they're up to Samuel as I write) just by waiting for his next interleaved joke or pointing out of more nonsense. I highly recommend you have a look.

He starts, quite logically, with the creation of the universe, and here's a few snippets from the book of Genesis to whet our appetite. The commentary is in italics; the commented in Big Biblical Bold:

Genesis 1
¹In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth.

Sorry quick qestion here, the beginning of what?

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

¹⁶And God made two great lights; the greater light to rule the day, and the lesser light to rule the night: he made the stars also.

Great we now have the sun and OK. I know I am quibbling here but we still on this day thing but Einstein states the speed of light is constant. Does it not take the light from Proxima centuri about 4.2 years to get here?

¹⁷And God set them in the firmament of the heaven to give light upon the earth,

Hang on I thought it said this firmament thingy whatever it was seperated the up waters from the down waters have I missed something?

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

²⁶And God said, Let us make man in our image, after our likeness: and let them have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over the cattle, and over all the earth, and over every creeping thing that creepeth upon the earth.

Who's this "US" he's talking to he never mentioned any help before?

²⁷So God created man in his own image, in the image of God created he him; male and female created he them.
²⁸And God blessed them, and God said unto them, Be fruitful, and multiply, and replenish the earth, and subdue it: and have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over every living thing that moveth upon the earth.
²⁹And God said, Behold, I have given you every herb bearing seed, which is upon the face of all the earth, and every tree, in the which is the fruit of a tree yielding seed; to you it shall be for meat.

If this man was vegetarian as this implies, why the fuck does god feel he has to say it will be as meat

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Genesis 2
 ⁷And the LORD God formed man of the dust of the ground, and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life; and man became a living soul.

Is this in addition to the couple he made last week? 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

¹¹The name of the first is Pison: that is it which compasseth the whole land of Havilah, where there is gold;

Gold? What the hell would he want that for?

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

¹⁷But of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, thou shalt not eat of it: for in the day that thou eatest thereof thou shalt surely die.

Is this a friendly warning or a threat? He never mentioned anything about the possibility of getting his dangly bits caught in the shears.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

²¹And the LORD God caused a deep sleep to fall upon Adam, and he slept: and he took one of his ribs, and closed up the flesh instead thereof;

So why not just make her out of the ground like all the other animals? Whereas this seems more like some cloning type thing. Hang on, grown from a male rib the clone would be male too. Thats basic genetics so it was Adam and Steve.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

²⁴Therefore shall a man leave his father and his mother, and shall cleave unto his wife: and they shall be one flesh.

How does he know what a father and mother is ?

²⁵And they were both naked, the man and his wife, and were not ashamed.

So these other people he made in the first week ? Were they too stuck up to fraternise with the gardener?

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

So there you have it. Pretty hilarious stuff I'm sure you'll agree. And if you don't then you're reading the wrong blog! So check out the Anal Iced Bible if you will and learn all about the good solid shite, what, ohh, two billion+ people believe even today. Dear oh dear oh dear...

Oh, by the way, if you really do want to start at the very beginning, then it's here. The navigation takes a bit of getting used to, oh, and I should say that if you prefer your ridiculing of the bible done a bit more politely, then Anal Iced Bible isn't actually the site for you. It's pretty crude.

See you in the gene pool

FrabulousFrog

Frog on a Log! ~ Stop This Sickness Now!

POSTED IN:  ~ Humour ~ Religion ~ Nutters    Tweet

Frog on a Log

Stop This Sickness Now!

I would just like to state how disgusted and shocked I was to find this repulsive image on The Freethinker website just now.

When I think about how long I took and how carefully I chose our cheery little green mascot for the Frabulous Frog Freethinker site, you will understand that I am very, very upset to see him riduculed like this.

First of all, the image is cruel and unpleasant. No creature should ever be treated like this, even as a joke and even if it is only plaster or papier maché. It makes me think of biology lesson dissections when I was 14 - yuk.

But what really gets me is the use of the ancient barbaric cross of the sick god cult lead by the notorious terrorist Jesus Christ. To sully the image of our lively little pond-dwelling pal with that of the leader of a group of mass murdering lunatics is beyond contempt. Oh well.

And talking of ponds, this little picture on the right shows you what a future 'Arc-Park', sorry, 'Arc Encounter', could look like.

Yep, you read that right. Kentucky could be the proud host of a Creationist theme park in a few years if what looks like a completely corrupt plan by some religious lunatics, sorry, tautology, gets accepted. It'll include a so-called life-sized copy of the arc, yeah!, along with a Tower of Babel and some typical middle-eastern villages, although I thought they didn't like people from the middle-east... oh dear, it's all so complicated, isn't it? Christians hating Muslims but worshipping someone from the middle-east. Bizarre.

And just to finish this little blether of recent findings on the web, check this out from MediaWatchWatch. Jesus with a massive hard on. Oops. Guess what? Yep, some Christian didn't like it and is prosecuting the Gateshead gallery what was showing this work of art.

What's funny is that the offending appendage isn't actually very well-done by the looks of it. Looks more like a dowel plug if you ask me. And I read some comments saying that the Romans or Greeks would have approved heartily, not to mention some Horny Hindu and boner Buddhist top dogs, virility being virility and all that.

Anyway. More sniggers tomorrow, pondlifers.

See you in the gene pool

FrabulousFrog

Book Review ~ 'Can A Robot Be Human?'

POSTED IN:  ~ Philosophy ~ Puzzles ~ Religion ~ Reviews    Tweet

Can A Robot Be Human?

Peter Cave

Oneworld Publications 2007

ISBN 9781851685318

Review

'If it doesn't make you think, you are probably dead already' is the first quote on the back cover, and there's no mistaking it: if you like philosophical puzzles then get a copy of this book forthwith. Or sooner.

I'm currently reading a couple in bed before I turn out the light, and I have to tell you that my bedtimes are getting later and later.

In fact, you'll see where I've been stealing, errr, borrowing some ideas from for my philosophical puzzles recently. So I'm repaying my moral debt here by saying immediately and unequivocally: buy 'Can a Robot be Human?' You'll love it.

The blurb on the back continues with the intriguing questions as follows:

• How unique are you?
• What does it really mean to be in love?
• Can you believe anyone who says 'I'm telling the truth'?
•  Can a murderer be innocent?
• What is the difference between a saint, a sinner, and a suicide bomber?

Now look folks, be gentle with me; this is my first stab at tackling this sort of publication, so excuse my wonder at these questions. Someone told me recently that they didn't have much time for philosophy because it just tended to be a bunch of people talking about stuff, much of it interesting, admittedly, but not actually getting much done.

Well I nodded and 'hmmm'ed in some sort of agreement, not really knowing what he was talking about. But be that as it may, you'll probably find yourself falling into this book and having problems pulling yourself out. These 'problems', if we can call them that, relate to our every day lives. Which is exactly what makes them so interesting. Sure, we're on a different level of thinking to that needed for every day activities. But nevertheless, there's great satisfaction in filling your head with this stuff, as opposed to watching videos of people killing each other or even the depressing daily ritual of reading or watching the news and... learning about how many people had killed each other that day.

The puzzles themselves cover all sorts of things. I've just dipped into the book at random and found a discussion on where our morals come from. Religious people, it is said, derive their ideas of right and wrong from their faith and its teachings. The puzzle suggests two twins who were somehow separated at birth, one growing up in a devoutly Catholic family and the other in a Muslim family. It also wonders what the two women's morals would be if they had been 'swapped' at birth and brought up in the opposite religion. Holds aren't barred and mentions of suicide bombers and horrific Catholic witch burning are invoked to bring the conundrum home.

Less scary, on a viceral level at least, is the puzzle of when a sandcastle in a breeze stops being a sandcastle. If we can tell no difference between  a fully fledged sandcastle, and the same sandcastle minus one grain of sand, then logically if we carried on doing that we would still be claiming it was a sandcastle when it was only a slight mound of sand.

And what about the incredible thought experiment when we try to work out why we cry or get angry or scared during films and plays, and even when listening to music. Are those emotions real or not? I real, we should be running up to the stage to help the woman in the play being attacked, shouldn't we? But if we know it's just a bunch of actors surrounded by directors and lighting technicians and so on, why do we emote at all. Brilliant.

Well, that's just a taster, and I'll show you the pictures, which are from the book, by a great artist called Jolyon Troscianko, who also researches into avian cognition, to whet your appetite for the rest. And as I said: buy 'Can a Robot be Human?'. You won't regret it. Having said that, would it really, logically, not be the biggest waste of time ever to regret something you haven't done... oh dear :-( I think I'm hooked on philosophical puzzles. I don't think this is the last time I'll be mentioning Mr.Cave and his philosophy puzzles.

See you in the gene pool

FrabulousFrog